Legal Opinion

Signal Oil & Gas Co. v. Dampskibsselskabet Dannebrog

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided December 7, 1938No. Nos. 7331, 7334Published

1Opinion of the Court

CUSHMAN, District Judge.

The stipulated facts show that the oil was furnished upon the credit of the vessels and that, in consequence, the asserted liens were created. The South Coast, South Coast S. S. Co. v. Rudbach, 251 U.S. 519, 40 S.Ct. 233, 64 L.Ed. 386; Piedmont Coal Co. v. Seaboard Fisheries Co., 254 U.S. 1-10, 41 S.Ct. 1, 65 L.Ed. 97, citing with approval The Bronx, 2 Cir., 246 F. 809; The Golden Gate, 9 Cir., 52 F.2d 397, certiorari denied Knutsen v. Associated Oil Co., 284 U.S. 682, 52 S.Ct. 199, 76 L.Ed. 576; The Luddco 41, 9 Cir., 66 F.2d 997; The Portland, 9 Cir., 273 F. 401; The…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Piedmont & Georges Creek Coal Co. v. Seaboard Fisheries Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1920
  2. The South CoastSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  3. The EverosaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1937
  4. The Golden GateCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1931
  5. National Surety Co. v. Union Oil Co. of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1921

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API