Mann v. United States
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the Court
LITTLETON, Judge.
The first contention of plaintiff is that the Commissioner of Internal Revenue proceeded in an unlawful manner and contrary to the provisions of section 250(d) of the Revenue Acts of 1918 and 1921 (40 Stat. 1083; 42 Stat. 265) in determining the tax liability for the fiscal year ended January 31,1919, in that he did not give plaintiff notice or an opportunity to be heard; that the application by the Commissioner of a portion of the total tax paid on the calendar year 1919 return in satisfaction of the total tax liability determined by him to be due for said fiscal year ending…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Edwards v. DouglasSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Mason v. RoutzahnSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Paso Robles Mercantile Co. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1929
- United States v. Mabel Elevator Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1925
3Cited by5 opinions
- Helvering v. Brooklyn City R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1934
- Illinois Terminal Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1931
- National Shirt Shops, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1932
- American Hide & Leather Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1930
- Mann v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1932