Legal Opinion

Harper v. Holmes

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided April 28, 1939No. 5855PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DREW, Judge.

Mr. and Mrs. Clyde Harper and their minor child, represented by her parents, instituted this suit to recover damages against E. Claude Holmes. The damages arose out of a collision of a car driven and owned by Holmes with the rear end of a wagon, owned and driven by Clyde Harper, and in which his wife and child were riding. The collision occurred on a straight road after dark, on August 13, 1937.

The facts are as follows:

Clyde Harper was driving his wagon in a northerly direction on the highway leading to Oak Grove in West Carroll Parish. The wagon was loaded with 16 bales of hay…

2Cited by11 opinions

  1. Planters Wholesale Grocery v. KincadeMississippi Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Car & General Ins. Corporation v. CheshireCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1947
  3. Shell Oil Co. v. SladeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1943
  4. New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. LedouxCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1947
  5. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. McCulloughCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1953

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API