Short v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Kan., Inc.
Court of Appeals of Kansas
1DissentAtcheson, J.
Based on the narrow issue Defendant Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Kansas presented in its motion for summary judgment and the limited factual support in the record, the Saline County District Court erred in holding as a matter of law that the insurance company *1070properly refused to pay for an electronic prosthetic leg for Plaintiff Zachary Short. The contract language Blue Cross relied on to deny Short's request doesn't so obviously mean what the company says it means. And Blue Cross hasn't shown its denial fits within that language. I would reverse the summary judgment the district court…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Cine SK8, Inc. v. Town of HenriettaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
- Catholic Diocese of Dodge City v. RaymerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1992
- Estate of Belden v. Brown CountyCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2011
- Simon v. National Farmers Organization, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1992
- SHAMBERG, JOHNSON & BERGMAN v. OliverSupreme Court of Kansas · 2009
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.