Legal Opinion

Amersham International v. Corning Glass Works

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided October 16, 1985No. Civ. A. No. 85-3321-KPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO STAY

JOYCE LONDON ALEXANDER, United States Magistrate.

Defendant, Corning Glass Works (Corning), brings this action to stay plaintiff’s patent infringement suit, pending final disposition of an interference proceeding brought by defendant in the United States Patent and Trademark Office.

The patent infringement suit, brought by Amersham International (Amersham), concerns Amersham’s patent no. 4,366,143 (143) issued on December 12, 1982. Patent 143 details a method of analyzing blood samples to ascertain the concentration of substances circulating in the blood.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Landis v. North American Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  2. Margaret Austin, Etc. v. Unarco Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1983
  3. Harmon Kardon, Inc. v. Ashley Hi-Fi A/K/A Ashley SoundCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1979
  4. General Foods Corp. v. Struthers Scientific & International Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1970

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Saint-Gobain Performance Plastics Corp. v. Advanced Flexible Composites, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API