Legal Opinion

Dixon v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided November 9, 1906No. 3583PublishedCited by 3 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

DAVIDSON, Presiding Judge.

At a former day of the term the judgment herein was affirmed, without considering the facts. The record at that time failed to show that the order for twenty days after adjournment of the term was allowed in which to file statement of facts; which defect has been supplied in connection with appellant’s motion for rehearing, showing that it was an omission on the part of the clerk in making up the transcript. The motion for rehearing is granted, and the case will be reviewed upon its merits.

Appellant was charged with living in adultery with Alice Holmes, while “then…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Kell Milling Co. v. Bank of MiamiCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913
  2. Clark v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1939
  3. Kell Milling Co. v. Bank of MiamiCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API