Legal Opinion
Liston v. Unum Corp. Officer Severance Plan
District Court, D. Maine
Decided July 17, 2002No. 2:01-cv-00080PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
SINGAL, District Judge.
A former officer of UNUMProvident Corporation sued her former employer, its severance plan, and the plan administrator to recover benefits allegedly due pursuant to the plan’s “Change of Control” provisions. Presently before the Court are Plaintiffs Motion for Additional Discovery (Docket # 35) and Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket #27). For the following reasons, the Court DENIES Plaintiffs Motion and GRANTS Defendants’ Motion.
I. LEGAL STANDARD
The Court will grant a motion for summary judgment if the record discloses that there is no genuine issue as…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Michael F. Terry v. Bayer Corporation and Bayer Corporation Disability PlanCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1998
- Chambers v. Family Health Plan Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
- Ward v. Massachusetts Health Research Institute, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2000
- Recupero v. New England Telephone & Telegraph Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Liston v. Unum Corp. Officer Severance PlanCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2003
- LaMarche v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2002