Legal Opinion · Dissent

Coley ex rel. Coley v. Hendrix

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 30, 1987No. 85-814Published

1DissentJones, Justice

The majority, relying on Kent v. Sims, 460 So.2d 144 (Ala.1984), White v. Law, 454 So.2d 515 (Ala.1984), and Allen v. Whitehead, 423 So.2d 835 (Ala.1982), is of the view that a change in our law would be required in order to reverse the summary judgment for the defendant in this dog-bite case. I respectfully disagree.

On December 7, 1983, a pit bulldog belonging to the defendant, G.T. Hendrix, attacked 8-year-old Michael Coley, causing him severe physical and emotional injury. This was the first time the 2-year-old dog had attacked anyone. The defendant’s motion for summary judgment was…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Fountain v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1981
  2. Horner v. First Nat. Bank of MobileSupreme Court of Alabama · 1985
  3. Barrett v. Farmers & Merchants BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 1984
  4. Saldi v. Brighton Stock Yard Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1962
  5. White v. LawSupreme Court of Alabama · 1984

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API