Legal Opinion

In re Three Thirteen Stratford

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 11, 1996No. 94-56367Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

87 F.3d 1322

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.

In re THREE THIRTEEN STRATFORD, a California General

Partnership, a Debtor in Possession in Chapter 11.

THREE THIRTEEN STRATFORD, a California General Partnership,

a Debtor in Possession in Chapter 11; Arthur G.

Lawrence; and Lorraine Howell,

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v.

CITY THRIFT AND LOAN ASSOCIATION, a California corporation;

Naftali…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Langenkamp v. CulpSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. In Re Bibo, Inc., a California Corporation, Debtor. Robert Fukutomi v. United States TrusteeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
  3. In Re Technical Knockout Graphics, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API