Legal Opinion
(PC) Brookins v. Acosta
District Court, E.D. California
Decided April 17, 2024No. 1:19-cv-00401Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 BARRY L. BROOKINS, No. 1:19-cv-00401-JLT-HBK (PC) 12 Plaintiff, Appeal No. 24-1801 13 v. ORDER REVOKING IN FORMA PAUPERIS STATUS ON APPEAL 14 F. ACOSTA, (Doc. 79) 15 Defendant. 16 17 Barry L. Brookins proceeded pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action 18 pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The Court dismissed the action as barred by the doctrine of res 19 judicata and entered judgment. (Docs. 72, 74-75.) On March 25, 2024, Plaintiff filed Notice of 20 Appeal, which was processed to the United States…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Coppedge v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Harry Franklin v. Ms. Murphy and Hoyt CuppCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Matthew Hooker v. American Airlines Iberia Airlines of SpainCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Elmo Williams v. H. v. FieldCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1968
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.