Legal Opinion
Vigilant Insurance v. Credit Suisse First Boston Corp.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided September 16, 2004PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Karla Moskowitz, J.), entered July 17, 2003, which granted plaintiff-counterclaim defendant’s and additional counterclaim defendants’ (collectively insurers) motions for summary judgment, declaring that defendant Credit Suisse First Boston Corporation (CSFB) is not entitled to coverage for that portion of its settlement with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and NASD Regulation, Inc. (NASDR) which required disgorgement of certain funds allegedly improperly obtained through violations of various securities regulations; and which granted so much…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Kenai Corp. v. National Union Fire Insurance (In Re Kenai Corp.)District Court, S.D. New York · 1992
- Level 3 Communications, Inc. v. Federal Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
- Reliance Group Holdings, Inc. v. National Union Fire InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
3Cited by24 opinions
- J.P. Morgan Securities Inc. v. Vigilant InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 2013
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Fendi Adele S.R.L.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2016
- J.P. Morgan Securities Inc. v. Vigilant InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- J.P. Morgan Securities Inc. v. Vigilant InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Westpoint International, Inc. v. American International South InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.