Legal Opinion

People ex rel. Pyclik v. Smith

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 27, 1981PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

— Judgment unanimously reversed and a new parole revocation hearing granted. Memorandum: Petitioner’s right to a parole revocation hearing before a “ ‘neutral and detached’ hearing body” (Morrissey v Brewer, 408 US 471, 489), was denied by virtue of the fact that the hearing officer had appeared as an attorney for the State at a prior proceeding in which petitioner’s underlying conviction had been challenged. It is *1017not necessary to decide whether the revocation hearing was affected by actual prejudice inasmuch as even the appearance of impropriety should be avoided (see People ex rel. Sweeney…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. People ex rel. Sweeney v. SmithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Benitez v. CoughlinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  2. People ex rel. Shippens v. SmithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API