Matter of Larson
New York Court of Appeals
The nature of the appeal and the material facts are stated in the opinion. (Reported below, 31 Hun, 539.) The order of Mr. Justice Barrett was not appealable to the General Term. (Oode, § 2058.) The order of General Term being final and dismissing the proceeding is appealable to this court.
Read the full summary
The nature of the appeal and the material facts are stated in the opinion. (Reported below, 31 Hun, 539.) The order of Mr. Justice Barrett was not appealable to the General Term. (Oode, § 2058.) The order of General Term being final and dismissing the proceeding is appealable to this court. (Code, § 2058.) The order for a further return was properly granted and was strictly in pursuance of the statute as well as in accordance with justice, the return made being defective and insufficient. (Code, § 2026; R. S., chap. 8, art. 2, part 2; Laws of 1873, chap. 830 ; Laws of 1849, chap. 244.) Before…
1Opinion of the Court
Pee Cueiam.
This is an appeal from an order of the General Term of the Supreme Court, in the first judicial department, made December 25, 1883, reversing an order of Mr. Justice Barrett, directing a further return to the writs of habeas corpus and certiorari issued by him on behalf of the appellant, to inquire into the cause of detention of an infant, the child of said appellant, and that the respondent, the Home of the Friendless, in such further return, disclose to whom, at what time, for what cause, and by what authority the transfer of the custody of Edna Elvira Larson, the infant named in…
2Cited by9 opinions
- In re the Adoption of DavisNew York Surrogate's Court · 1932
- People ex rel. Lentino v. FeserAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1921
- People Ex Rel. Duryee v. . DuryeeNew York Court of Appeals · 1907
- Gundlin v. Hamburg-American Packet Co.New York Court of Common Pleas · 1894
- Hill v. PattonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1938
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.