Potter v. Patee
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion
ON MOTION FOR REHEARING
2Per curiam
In their petition for rehearing, appellants are correct in stating that the opinion does not treat of the fact that only ten directors were elected at the respondents’ shareholders’ meeting of December 6, 1970, when the by-laws, as amended, provide that twelve directors shall be elected. The trial court did, however, cover the matter in its finding by observing that the by-laws provide that officers, who are not directors, are members of the board of directors, which could make a board of the maximum size of seventeen. The court concluded that Francis Ross and Katherine…
3Cases cited3 opinions
- Schmidt v. MitchellCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1897
- Wright v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1885
- In re the Excelsior Fire InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1862