Legal Opinion

Wilkes v. Southern Ry.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided March 22, 1910No. 7518PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Before Klugh, J., Fairfield, February, 1909. Action by Jas. Y. Wilkes against Southern Ry. Co. From judgment on Circuit affirming judgment of magistrate, JnO'. D. Blair, defendant, appeals. cites: Mortgagee is proper party to sue: 82 S'. C., 500; 48 S'. C., 405. Magistrate court had no jurisdiction of mortgagor’s equity of redemption: 48 S. C., 405; 51 S¡. C., 42; 59 S. C., 435; 60' S. C., 103. Plaintiff showed no damages cognisable in magistrate court: 81 S. C., 461.…

Read the full summary

Before Klugh, J., Fairfield, February, 1909. Action by Jas. Y. Wilkes against Southern Ry. Co. From judgment on Circuit affirming judgment of magistrate, JnO'. D. Blair, defendant, appeals. cites: Mortgagee is proper party to sue: 82 S'. C., 500; 48 S'. C., 405. Magistrate court had no jurisdiction of mortgagor’s equity of redemption: 48 S. C., 405; 51 S¡. C., 42; 59 S. C., 435; 60' S. C., 103. Plaintiff showed no damages cognisable in magistrate court: 81 S. C., 461. Recovery may be had by mortgagor: 6 Dawson’s R. R. & P., 5011; 5 Ency., 999; 7 Cyc., 18; Bliss on Code Pleading, section 23; 2…

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Hydrick.

Plaintiff recovered damages for injury to a mule, which was struck by one of defendant’s trains. On cross-examination, he testified: “Mr. Ragsdale has small amount due on this mule under mortgage.” The testimony further showed that this Mr. Ragsdale was a witness for the plaintiff at the trial, and had written a letter to the defendant’s stock claim agent for the plaintiff, which was signed by the plaintiff, demanding payment to the plaintiff for the damage to the mule.

The sole question raised by the exceptions, which this Court can…

2Cited by15 opinions

  1. Gover v. Central Vermont Railway Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1922
  2. Harris v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  3. Harris v. Seaboard Air Line Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  4. Munz v. National Bond Investment CompanyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1932
  5. McCullough v. Goodrich & Pennington Mortgage Fund, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2007

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API