Town of Pine Bluffs v. Eisele
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Concurring in part, dissenting in part
BURKE, Chief Justice,
concurring in part and dissenting in part, in which KAUTZ, Justice, joins.
[¶29] I agree that the Town was not required to exhaust administrative remedies before seeking to enjoin an illegal assessment pursuant to Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 39-13-109(c). However, I disagree with the majority’s conclusion that the assessment was not “illegal” and that the complaint was properly dismissed. I would reverse the decision of the district court.
[¶30] In interpreting any statute, we endeavor to ascertain legislative intent. Our primary source for determining that intent is the plain and…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Bunten v. Rock Springs Grazing Ass'nWyoming Supreme Court · 1923
- Krenning v. Heart Mountain Irrigation DistrictWyoming Supreme Court · 2009
- State ex inf. Crow v. West Side Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1898
- Hacker v. HoweNebraska Supreme Court · 1904
- Odem v. Sinton Independent School Dist.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1921
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.