Legal Opinion

Stocker v. Commissioner

United States Board of Tax Appeals

Decided July 16, 1928No. Docket Nos. 12844-12851Published

1. Amounts distributed in 1919 in liquidation of corporations out of earnings and profits accumulated since February 28, 1913, are payments in exchange for its stock subject to both normal and surtax under section 201(c) of the Revenue Act of 1918. 2. An erroneous construction of the laws by the Treasury Department does not preclude nor estop the Government from collecting a tax which is legally due.

1Opinion of the Court

BEN STOCKER, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT.

JACOB F. MAY, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT.

H. M. MAY, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT.

B. H. MAY, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT.

MAX H. MAY, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT.

SOL MAY, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT.

PAUL MAY, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT.

HARRY MAY, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT.

Stocker v. Commissioner

Docket…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Stocker v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API