Legal Opinion

National Labor Relations Board v. Drummond

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided February 8, 1954No. 11958PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

This cause having been heard and considered by the Court on the record, briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties;

And the Court being of the. opinion that, for jurisdictional purpos-.i es, the operations of respondent’s Ports-mouth, Ohio, store were not to be considered as something separate and apart from the other stores owned and op-, erated by the respondent under a central management, N. L. R. B. v. Weyerhaeuser Timber Co., 9 Cir., 132 F.2d 234, 235; that in any event jurisdiction under the Act does not depend upon whether the volume of commerce is large or small, N. L.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Joy Silk Mills, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1950
  2. National Labor Relations Board v. KobritzCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1951
  3. Atlas Underwear Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1941
  4. National Labor Relations Board v. J. L. Hudson Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1943
  5. National Labor Relations Board v. Niles Fire Brick Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1941

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. National Labor Relations Board v. Armco Drainage & Metal Products, Inc., Fabricating DivisionCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1955
  2. Lindsay v. Teamsters Union, Local No. 74North Dakota Supreme Court · 1959
  3. National Labor Relations Board v. Marcellus S. Merrill and Geraldine R. Merrill, Co-Partners, D/B/A Merrill Axle and Wheel ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1968
  4. Sports Arena Employees v. New York State Labor Relations BoardNew York Supreme Court · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API