Legal Opinion

FROMPOVICZ v. NIAGARA BOTTLING, LLC

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided October 9, 2019No. 2:18-cv-00054Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA STANLEY F. FROMPOVICZ, CIVIL ACTION Plaintiff, v. NIAGARA BOTTLING, LLC, ICE RIVER NO. 18-54 SPRINGS WATER CO, INC., AND JAMES J. LAND, JR., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION This case concerns allegations that certain entities in the water extraction and bottling industries falsely labeled and sold “well water” as the more desirable “spring water.” In an earlier opinion, this Court found that Plaintiff Stanley Frompovicz made out viable false advertising claims under the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1125(a), against…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. In Re Hydrogen Peroxide Antitrust LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
  3. Marcus v. BMW of North America, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2012
  4. In re Schering Plough Corp. Erisa LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
  5. William Hayes v. WalMart Stores IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2013

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API