Edney v. Baum
Nebraska Supreme Court
■ •Error from the . district court of Lancaster county. Tried below before Tibbets, J. -cited, contending that there was such misconduct both on the part of defendants below and of the jury as warranted a reversal: Ensign v. Harney, 15 Neb., 330; Knight v. Free-port, 13 Mass., 218; Thompson, Trials, sec. 2605; Stampofski v. Steffens, 79 111., 303; Ortman v. Union P. R. Co., -32 Kan., 419; Winslow v. Morrill, 68 Me., 362; Bradbury / v. Cony, 62 Me., 223; Sanderson v. Nashua,…
Read the full summary
■ •Error from the . district court of Lancaster county. Tried below before Tibbets, J. -cited, contending that there was such misconduct both on the part of defendants below and of the jury as warranted a reversal: Ensign v. Harney, 15 Neb., 330; Knight v. Free-port, 13 Mass., 218; Thompson, Trials, sec. 2605; Stampofski v. Steffens, 79 111., 303; Ortman v. Union P. R. Co., -32 Kan., 419; Winslow v. Morrill, 68 Me., 362; Bradbury / v. Cony, 62 Me., 223; Sanderson v. Nashua, 44 N. H., 492; People v. Bonney, 19 Cal., 426. The verdict was too small, forced, and without support in the evidence.…
1Opinion of the Court
Ievine, C..This, was an action brought by the plaintiffs in error against, the. defendants .in error to recover damages because of certain alleged false representations made by the defendants to the plaintiffs, inducing the purchase by the plaintiffs of a number of lots in the city of Lincoln. There was a verdict for the plaintiffs for $500 after a protracted trial of the case. The plaintiffs prosecute error, arguing in their briefs-only- two points affecting the merits of the case.
The lots referred to formed.a portion of the consideration for the conveyance by the plaintiffs to the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Veneman v. McCurtainNebraska Supreme Court · 1892
3Cited by9 opinions
- Debney v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1895
- Hunt v. Methodist HospitalNebraska Supreme Court · 1992
- Edney v. BaumNebraska Supreme Court · 1903
- Williams v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1925
- Lindsay v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1895
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.