Legal Opinion · Concurrence

City of Muskegon v. Slater

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 2, 1967No. Calendar 7, Docket 51,417Published

1ConcurrenceAdams, J.

I agree with Justice Kelly that the statutory limitation of an attorney fee not exceeding $25 is controlling and that attorney fees are not a part of just compensation, to be fixed by the Court under article 10, § 2, Michigan Constitution of 1963, for the taking of private property for public use.

At the present time the allowance of costs, including attorney fees, is dealt with by a hodgepodge of statutory provisions that follow no pattern and that, when viewed as a whole, are completely unjust.

Contrast, for example, the result in this case with the result in In re Kent County Airport, 368…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. TeasdaleMichigan Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Merkel v. LongMichigan Supreme Court · 1965
  3. In Re Ford's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1954
  4. People v. MilesMichigan Supreme Court · 1965
  5. In Re Kent County AirportMichigan Supreme Court · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API