Legal Opinion

Fleser v. Aranjo

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided October 7, 1954No. 29,166PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFlanagan, C. J.

Appellees have filed their petition for transfer of this cause to the Appellate Court. It is an appeal from a judgment of permanent injunction. Clearly we are without jurisdiction unless a constituí tional quéstion is involved and duly presented. Burns’ 1946 Replacement, §4-214.

Appellants state in their brief that the judgment deprives appellants of their property without due'process of law. No such question was presented to the* trial court, and such mere statement in appellants’ brief does not make a constitutional question involved and duly presented. Pivak v. State (1931), 202 Ind. 417,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Pivak v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Fleser v. AranjoIndiana Court of Appeals · 1954
  3. Department of Insurance v. Indiana Travelers Assurance Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1944

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Fleser v. AranjoIndiana Court of Appeals · 1954
  2. Marion County Board of Zoning Appeals v. TrivettIndiana Supreme Court · 1966
  3. V. H. Juerling & Sons, Inc. v. Second National Bank of RichmondIndiana Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Wetter v. City of IndianapolisIndiana Supreme Court · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API