Legal Opinion

Elna Realty Co. v. Mamaquarro Apartments Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 11, 1931PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKapper, J.

Defendants moved under rule 107, subdivision 5, of the Rules of Civil Practice, to dismiss the complaint upon the ground that “ there is an existing final judgment or decree of a court of competent jurisdiction rendered on the merits, determining the same cause of action between the parties.”

On December 4, 1928, the corporate parties, plaintiff and defendant, entered into a contract for the exchange of real property. The property owned by the defendant corporation, hereinafter referred to as “ Mamaquarro,” was valued at $300,000, mortgaged for $147,000, leaving an equity of $153,000. The…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Schuylkill Fuel Corp. v. B. & C. Nieberg Realty Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1929
  2. Schenck v. . State Line Telephone Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1924

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. 379 Madison Avenue, Inc. v. Stuyvesant Co.City of New York Municipal Court · 1933
  2. Slote v. Cascade Holding Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API