Elna Realty Co. v. Mamaquarro Apartments Corp.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the CourtKapper, J.
Defendants moved under rule 107, subdivision 5, of the Rules of Civil Practice, to dismiss the complaint upon the ground that “ there is an existing final judgment or decree of a court of competent jurisdiction rendered on the merits, determining the same cause of action between the parties.”
On December 4, 1928, the corporate parties, plaintiff and defendant, entered into a contract for the exchange of real property. The property owned by the defendant corporation, hereinafter referred to as “ Mamaquarro,” was valued at $300,000, mortgaged for $147,000, leaving an equity of $153,000. The…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Schuylkill Fuel Corp. v. B. & C. Nieberg Realty Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1929
- Schenck v. . State Line Telephone Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1924
3Cited by2 opinions
- 379 Madison Avenue, Inc. v. Stuyvesant Co.City of New York Municipal Court · 1933
- Slote v. Cascade Holding Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937