Russell v. Wolff
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Appeal by defendants from judgment of the Tenth District Oourt.
1Opinion of the CourtMoAdam, J.
The action is to recover $135 paid to the defendants under the following circumstances:
About July 28, 1896, the plaintiff purchased a gray horse from the defendants, who keep a sales stable. The price was $150, on which the plaintiff paid $60, and gave his note at two months for the balance, $90'; at the same time executing an agreement that the title to the horse should remain in the defendants until it was fully paid for. It was agreed at the time of the purchase that if the horse did not suit the plaintiff he might.send it back and get another, as the defendants had plenty of horses on…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Sturtevant v. . OrserNew York Court of Appeals · 1862
- Fulton v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1893
- Grouse v. WolfNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1893
- Collins v. BrooksNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1861
- Coon v. ReedNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1857
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. MikkelsenDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2021
- Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. MikkelsenDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2021