Legal Opinion
Interconnect Planning Corp. v. Feil
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided June 20, 1984No. 80 Civ. 6602 (KTD)PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM & ORDER
KEVIN THOMAS DUFFY, District Judge:
Defendants, Thomas E. Feil and V Band Systems, Inc. (“V Band”) move for partial summary judgment dismissing plaintiff Interconnect Planning Corporation’s (“IPC”) patent infringement counterclaim that is based on Reissue Patent number 31,144 (“ ’144”) and for judgment on defendants’ eleventh counterclaim. 1
BACKGROUND
Defendants’ motion for summary judgment concerns Reissue Patent ’144 based on Patent 3,991,282 (’282). On an earlier motion by defendants for summary judgment, I found Patent ’282 invalid for obviousness. See Interconnect…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Blonder-Tongue Laboratories, Inc. v. University of Illinois FoundationSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- American Hoist & Derrick Company, Cross-Appellee v. Sowa & Sons, Inc., Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Jerry F. Connell, Gary F. Burns and Conelco, Inc., Appellants/cross-Appellees v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., a Corporation, Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- Sakraida v. Ag Pro, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Interconnect Planning Corporation v. Thomas E. Feil, Robert O. Carpenter, v Band Systems, Inc., and Turret Equipment Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985