Legal Opinion

Hughes v. M'Coun's administrator

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided April 5, 1814PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*254OPINION of the Court, by

Judge Owsley.

— The; plaintiff in error prosecuted an action at law against toe intestate, upon a bond for lilt. 16s. bearing date the ^arch 1795, and payable the 1st of May thereafter, and after a trial on an issue joined to the plea of payment, recovered judgment for the amount of the ^oa<^ with interest, See. To obtain relief from this judgment the intestate in his lifetime exhibited his bill in chancery, in which he charges, that he paid the plain-tiffin error, in part discharge of the. bond, a negro aaa the pnce of one hundred pounds, and alleges that the plaintiff…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Kibby v. BinionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  2. Chicago, Danville & Vincennes Railroad v. FieldIllinois Supreme Court · 1877
  3. Green v. RobinsonMississippi Supreme Court · 1840
  4. Hempstead v. WatkinsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1845
  5. Tribble v. TaulCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1828

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API