Legal Opinion

Thompson v. Long

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 10, 1990No. 89-1372-L; CA A63655PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

In this FED action, the trial court entered a judgment for plaintiff and granted his request for reasonable attorney fees. Defendant appeals and argues that the award of attorney fees was error. We vacate the award.

A party claiming attorney fees must serve “a verified and detailed statement of the amount of attorney fees[.]” ORCP 68C(4)(a)(i). “Detailed” means “marked by abundant detail or by thoroughness in treating small items or parts.” Parker v. Scharbach, 75 Or App 530, 707 P2d 85 (1985). The affidavit in support of the fees provides:

“That my hourly fee for this type of matter is $100.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Parker v. ScharbachCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
  2. Matter of GrandyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Beeler v. Dept. of Rev.Oregon Tax Court · 2006
  2. Gall v. Department of RevenueOregon Tax Court · 2006
  3. Gall v. Department of RevenueOregon Tax Court · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API