Legal Opinion

Maffett v. Thompson

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 14, 1898PublishedCited by 10 opinions

From Multnomah: Henry E. McGinn, Judge. Suit by Anna M. Maffett against E. H. Thompson. The cause was tried before M. L. Pipes, Esq., as referee, who filed a report dismissing both the complaint and the counterclaim of defendant. The referee’s report was affirmed, and defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Wolverton

This suit was instituted for the purpose of enjoining and restraining the defendant from trespassing upon and interfering with plaintiff’s use of certain premises and property, consisting of a flume and right of way over certain lands upon which the same is constructed. Plaintiff obtained a temporary restraining order, but, upon the filing of the answer containing an alleged counterclaim and prayer for an injunction, the order was rescinded, and plaintiff was temporarily enjoined instead. In his separate defense, by way of counterclaim, the defendant- alleges, in substance: That the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Mott v. MottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Warner v. DarrowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Christensen v. Pacific Coast Borax Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Hardin v. EmmonsNevada Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Lowenstein v. GlidewellU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Arkansas · 1878

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Hanna v. HopeOregon Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Hawley v. HawleyOregon Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Washington National Building, Loan & Investment Ass'n v. SaundersWashington Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Merrill v. HexterOregon Supreme Court · 1908
  5. State v. Pacific Live Stock Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1919

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API