Legal Opinion

Kane v. Ginnel

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided June 21, 2018No. 2018 NYSlipOp 50998(U)Published

1Opinion of the Court

Louise M. Russo Kane, Appellant,

against

Daniel Ginnel, Defendant, and Ginnel Associates, Respondent.

Louise M. Russo Kane, appellant pro se. Ginnel Associates, respondent pro se.

Appeal, on the ground of inadequacy, from a judgment of the Justice Court of the Town of Bedford, Westchester County (David A. Menken, J.), entered July 14, 2016. The judgment, insofar as appealed from, after a nonjury trial, awarded plaintiff the principal sum of $320.67 as against defendant Ginnel Associates.

ORDERED that the judgment, insofar as appealed from, is affirmed, without costs.

In this small claims action,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Williams v. RoperAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  2. Ross v. FriedmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  3. Vizzari v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  4. Kincade v. KincadeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  5. Gennes v. Yellow Book of New York, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API