Legal Opinion
M.A. DeAtley Construction, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided February 28, 2007No. 04-1052 CPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DAMICH, Chief Judge.
This case comes before the Court on Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss three of the five counts in Plaintiffs Complaint in their entirety and to dismiss one count in part. Plaintiff, M.A. DeAtley Construction, Inc. (“DeAtley”), seeks an equitable adjustment and/or damages for costs incurred in excess of the contract price for the Government’s requiring it to replace crushed rock, laid as foundation for a road reconstruction project. Defendant requests partial dismissal for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1) of the Rules of the United States…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Karen S. Reynolds v. Army and Air Force Exchange ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Louise J. Hamlet v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1989
- Reflectone, Inc. v. John H. Dalton, Secretary of the NavyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Jimmie Ann Taylor, Ladell Vasicek, Noma Chriss, Martha Cole, and Sara M. McCarthy v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- BLR Group of America, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
- ATK Thiokol, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
- Kiewit Infrastructure West Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2019
- Monterey Consultants, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2022
- Sarro & Associates, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2021
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.