Legal Opinion

Terry v. Rosell

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided November 15, 1877PublishedCited by 14 opinions

APPEAL from Pulaski Chancery Court. Hon. John R. Eakin, Chancellor.

1Opinion of the Court

■Turner, J.:

This is a bill in equity, tiled in the Pulaski Chancery Court, by George E. Rosell against Francis A. Terry, Cradock R. 'Vaughan and Evelina Vaughan, his wife. The material facts of the cause as set forth in the bill, are: That early in the year 1868, the defendant, Cradock R. Vaughan, by parol, bargained and sold to the plaintiff, Rosell, the fractional part of section nine, township one, range eleven Avest, containing ninety-six acres of land, more or less, situate in the County of Pulaski, State of Arkansas. That in pursuance of said sale the plaintiff paid to the defendant,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Lloyd v. BrewsterNew York Court of Chancery · 1834
  2. Hancock v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1858
  3. Colton v. RossNew York Court of Chancery · 1831

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Hardin v. BoydSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  2. Choctaw, O. G. R. Co. v. BurgessSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  3. Turman v. SanfordSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1901
  4. Perry County Bank v. RankinSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1905
  5. Moore v. TillmanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1926

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API