Legal Opinion

Brown v. Cadmus Holding Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 15, 1933PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Appeal dismissed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. A ruling upon an objection to a question propounded in the course of supplementary proceedings may not be made the subject of an appealable order. Such a ruling does not differ from a similar ruling on the receipt or rejection of evidence in the course of a trial of an action, which likewise may not be made the subject of a separate appeal. (Lundy v. City of New York, 233 App. Div. 763.) A witness who is improperly interrogated may have relief by refusing to answer and resisting proceedings in contempt where, if he is acting in good…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Lundy v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1931

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Jackson v. B. L. T. Garment Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1944
  2. Le Blanc v. DuncanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940
  3. Gorea v. PinskyNew York Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Foremost Insurance Co. Grand Rapids v. Facultative Group, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
  5. Fabrizio v. FaderAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1958

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API