Brown v. Cadmus Holding Corp.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Appeal dismissed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. A ruling upon an objection to a question propounded in the course of supplementary proceedings may not be made the subject of an appealable order. Such a ruling does not differ from a similar ruling on the receipt or rejection of evidence in the course of a trial of an action, which likewise may not be made the subject of a separate appeal. (Lundy v. City of New York, 233 App. Div. 763.) A witness who is improperly interrogated may have relief by refusing to answer and resisting proceedings in contempt where, if he is acting in good…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Lundy v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1931
3Cited by7 opinions
- Jackson v. B. L. T. Garment Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1944
- Le Blanc v. DuncanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940
- Gorea v. PinskyNew York Supreme Court · 1974
- Foremost Insurance Co. Grand Rapids v. Facultative Group, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
- Fabrizio v. FaderAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1958
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.