Legal Opinion
Terrell v. Humble Oil & Refining Co.
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided July 3, 1963PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
80 N.J. Super. 51 (1963)
192 A.2d 850
CHARLES J. TERRELL, CECIL J. WYMAN, EDWIN R. SELESKE, STANLEY E. MORRISSEY AND FRANK J. MORRISSEY, ON BEHALF OF THEMSELVES AND ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,
v.
HUMBLE OIL & REFINING COMPANY, A DELAWARE CORPORATION, ET AL., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued June 17, 1963.
Decided July 3, 1963.
Before Judges CONFORD, GAULKIN and KILKENNY.
Mr. Charles Thatcher argued the cause for the plaintiffs (Messrs. Thatcher and Thatcher, attorneys).
Mr. William L. Dill, Jr. argued the cause for the defendants…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Supreme Tribe of Ben-Hur v. CaubleSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Joseph v. Farnsworth Radio & Television Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1951
- Athas v. DayDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1958
- Speed v. Transamerica Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1945
- Zaleski v. LOCAL 401, UNITED ELEC., ETC., OF AM.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1950
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Branch v. WhiteNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1968
- Neil v. KleinNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1976
- Conover v. Packanack Lake Country ClubNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1967