Legal Opinion

Tesciona v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided October 29, 1943PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Frank Tesciona has filed what he-calls a motion and petition to vacate judg*569ment and correct sentence, addressed to this court. This court has no jurisdiction to grant such an order. The petition, however, recites that a motion was made in the lower court to correct the judgment and sentence imposed upon Tesciona by the United States District Court for the Southern District of California based upon his claim that several of the counts state but a single offense for which but a single penalty can be imposed. The District Court denied the motion on May 10, 1943 and refused to allow an appeal…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Nye v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Wells v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. O'Brien v. SquierCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1943

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Tesciona v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API