Legal Opinion

Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. Power

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 4, 1889No. 13,201PublishedCited by 13 opinions

From the Hamilton Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Elliott, C. J. —

The counties of Hamilton and Madison constituted the twenty-fourth judicial circuit at the time this action was tried. On the 29th day of the regular November term, 1885, an order was made reciting that the judge of the *270court had been an attorney in many cases, and directing that an adjourned term of the court be held, commencing on the first Monday in January, 1886. Notice was given according to law. At the time the order was made the defendant’s counsel were in court, and, as the bill of exceptions recites, “ knew of the time and manner determined upon for holding the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Smurr v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. SumnerIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Murphy v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  4. Street v. ChapmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1867
  5. Schlungger v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1888

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Midland Railway Co. v. FisherIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Cambria Iron Co. v. Union Trust Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Evans v. State ex rel. FreemanIndiana Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Bryant v. OwensIndiana Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Moerecke v. BryanIndiana Supreme Court · 1915

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API