Legal Opinion

Pesa v. Ginsberg

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 29, 1992PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

— Order and judgment (one paper), Supreme Court, New York County (Diane A. Lebedeff, J.), entered or or about June 21, 1991, which, inter alia, granted defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiff, a painter, was injured attempting to move furniture in the course of performing a painting contract in defendants’ house. His cause of action based on Labor Law § 240 (1) was properly dismissed, since that section applies only to work performed at heights (Rocovich v Consolidated Edison Co., 78 NY2d 509). Nor does plaintiff have a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Rocovich v. Consolidated Edison Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1991
  2. Schwartz v. FoleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Kostyj v. BabiarzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  2. Lieberth v. WaldenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  3. Jumawan v. SchnittAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  4. Ortizv. PenaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  5. Garcia v. MartinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API