Victor Sewing Machine Co. v. Scheffler
California Supreme Court
Appeal by the plaintiff from a judgment in the District Court of the Fifteenth Judicial District of the State of California, in and for the City and County of San Francisco, and from an order denying a motion for a new trial Dwiselle, J. Action upon a bond. The facts are stated in the opinion of the Court.
1Opinion of the Court
McKinstry, J.:
The action was brought against defendant, as surety upon a bond executed by one Lonsdale, to secure the performance of an agreement between plaintiff and said Lonsdale, as plaintiff’s agent at Peoria, Illinois, for the sale of sewing machines. By the agreement, plaintiff was to ship to Chicago six of its sewing machines, marked to consignee at Peoria, and as often as an account of sales should be rendered by consignee to consignor, together with the full proceeds of said sales (except as otherwise provided), the consignor, plaintiff, on the request of consignee, to ship to his…
2Cited by6 opinions
- People's Lumber Co. v. GillardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
- Roberts v. DonovanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- Weed Sewing Machine Co. v. WinchelIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
- Roche v. BaldwinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
- W. W. Kimball Co. v. BakerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1885
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.