Legal Opinion

Demchak v. Kingsley

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided February 1, 1966PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

90 N.J. Super. 190 (1966)

216 A.2d 753

GEORGE DEMCHAK, EXECUTOR OF THE LAST WILL AND TESTAMENT OF ANDREW DEMCHAK, DECEASED, APPELLANT,

v.

WILLIAM KINGSLEY, ACTING DIRECTOR, DIVISION OF TAXATION, ETC., RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued November 22, 1965.

Decided February 1, 1966.

Before Judges GOLDMANN, FOLEY and COLLESTER.

Mr. Milton T. Lasher argued the cause for appellant.

Mr. Elias Abelson, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent (Mr. Arthur J. Sills, Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney).

The opinion of the court was delivered by COLLESTER,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Telis v. TelisSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1942
  2. Frank v. Frank's Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1952
  3. Hampton v. Hampton Holding Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1955
  4. Pope v. KingsleySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1963
  5. Hill v. BugbeeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1918

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Donovan v. BaldwinNew Jersey Tax Court · 1988
  2. Brancasons v. Carlstadt BoroughNew Jersey Tax Court · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API