Legal Opinion · Dissent

Griffin v. City of Talladega

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided September 6, 1996No. 1950243Published

1DissentShores, Justice

I respectfully dissent, because I do not believe the summary judgment was appropriate in this wrongful death action.

The plaintiff’s decedent, Kenneth Griffin, who was deaf, died as the result of injuries he sustained when his motor vehicle was struck by a train at the Tinney Street railroad crossing in Talladega. The passenger riding with Griffin at the time of the accident was also deaf.

The plaintiff did not sue the railroad. She sued the City of Talladega, alleging 1) that it had negligently maintained a defective public street and railroad grade crossing; 2) that it had done so with…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hale v. City of TuscaloosaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1984
  2. Peoples v. Town of RaglandSupreme Court of Alabama · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API