Collins v. Merritt-Chapman & Scott
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1ConcurrenceTownsend, J.
I cannot agree with the decision in this case holding that the courts of Georgia are without jurisdiction of the subject matter for the reason that exclusive jurisdiction is vested in the National Labor Relations Board under 29 U. S. C. A. § 151 et seq. The case is here on demurrer, and, under the allegations of the petition, the N. L. R. B. has no jurisdiction of the action for the reason that it does not appear *862that “the activity of the employer defendant constitutes what is defined as ‘affecting commerce/ ” as set out on page 4 of the majority opinion. The term “affecting commerce” means…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Sandt v. MasonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1951
- Holmes v. BrownSupreme Court of Georgia · 1917
- Union Fraternal League of Boston v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
- Bowden v. KennedySupreme Court of Georgia · 1938