Legal Opinion

Louisville & N. R. v. Bosworth

District Court, E.D. Kentucky

Decided August 31, 1915No. 768PublishedCited by 15 opinions

In Equity. Suit by the Louisville & Nashville Railroad Company against H. M. Bosworth, Thomas S. Rhea, and C. F. Crecilius, individually and as constituting the Board of Valuation and Assessment of the State of Kentucky, H. M. Bosworth, Auditor of Public Accounts of the State of Kentucky, G. B. Likens, Assistant Auditor, James Gar-nett, Attorney General, C. H. Morris, First Assistant Attorney General, M. M. Logan, Second Assistant Attorney General, O. S. Hogan,' Third…

Read the full summary

In Equity. Suit by the Louisville & Nashville Railroad Company against H. M. Bosworth, Thomas S. Rhea, and C. F. Crecilius, individually and as constituting the Board of Valuation and Assessment of the State of Kentucky, H. M. Bosworth, Auditor of Public Accounts of the State of Kentucky, G. B. Likens, Assistant Auditor, James Gar-nett, Attorney General, C. H. Morris, First Assistant Attorney General, M. M. Logan, Second Assistant Attorney General, O. S. Hogan,' Third Assistant Attorney General, of the state of Kentucky, Victor' A. Bradley, Commonwealth’s Attorney for the Franklin Circuit…

1Opinion of the Court

COCHRAN, District Judge.

This suit is before me for final decree. The plaintiff seeks thereby an injunction against the enforcement of the assessment of its franchise in this state for the year 1913. The amount of the assessment is $45,658,630. When it was brought another suit was pending in which plaintiff sought an injunction against the enforcement of the assessment for the year 1912, which amounted, substantially to the same sum, to wit, $45,428,074, and I had sustained a motion therein for a preliminary injunction on condition that the taxes on $22,899,300 thereof be first paid, which…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  2. Ex Parte VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  3. Davidson v. New OrleansSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  4. Taylor v. SecorSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  5. Virginia v. RivesSupreme Court of the United States · 1880

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Miller & Lux Inc. v. RichardsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Public Service Commission of TennesseeDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1966
  3. Continental Nat. Bank of Salt Lake City v. NaylorUtah Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Baltimore & Ohio Southwestern Railroad v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1917
  5. City of Detroit v. Detroit & Canada Tunnel Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1937

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API