Legal Opinion

Santa Fé Pac. R. v. Payne

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided June 2, 1920No. 3340PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia. Bill by the Santa Fé Pacific Railroad Company against Franklin K. Lane, Secretary of the Interior, and continued against John Barton Payne, his successor in office, to enjoin the canceling of a selection made in exchange for lands relinquished. From a decree dismissing the bill, the plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

ROBB, Associate Justice.

Appeal from a decree in the Supreme Court of the District, dismissing appellant’s bill to have the Secretary of the Interior enjoined from canceling a selection made by appellant under the Act of April 28, 1904 (33 Stat. 556), in exchange for lands relinquished.

A grant was made by the Act of July 27, 1866 (14 Stat. 292), in aid of the construction of the Atlantic & Pacific Railroad, and in that act it was provided that the word “mineral,” as used therein, should not *654be held to include iron or coal. Appellant is the successor in interest to all the rights of the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Knight v. United States Land Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1891
  2. Cameron v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  3. United States Ex Rel. Riverside Oil Co. v. HitchcockSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  4. United States Ex Rel. Ness v. FisherSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  5. United States v. Brewer-Elliott Oil & Gas Co.District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1918

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Santa Fe Pacific Railroad v. FallSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  2. Red Canyon Sheep Co. v. IckesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1938
  3. Santa Fé Pac. R. v. PayneDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1920

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API