Legal Opinion
Newcomb v. Pattillo
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided March 28, 1969No. 44020PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Jordan, Presiding Judge.
The purported amendment to the enumeration of errors, not filed within the time allowed, will not be considered. Foskey v. Kirkland, 221 Ga. 773 (1) (147 SE2d 310); Arkwright v. State, 223 Ga. 768, 769 (158 SE2d 370). The original enumeration of errors was filed within the time allowed, however, and includes in the first numbered paragraph the assertion of error “in not sustaining the motion for a new trial, as amended.” The remainder of this paragraph and the remaining numbered paragraphs clearly disclose an intent to preserve the issues made by the general and…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Hill v. WillisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1968
- Nathan v. DuncanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
- Tiller v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1968
- Hollywood Baptist Church of Rome v. State Highway DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
- Hay v. CarterCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1956
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. LutherCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1973
- Parham v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
- DeVane v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1980
- Jim Walter Corp. v. WardCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1979
- Seabolt v. CheesboroughCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.