Legal Opinion

Bonner v. Saul

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Decided July 17, 2020No. 1:19-cv-01370Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA SUZANNE L. BONNER, : Civil No. 1:19-CV-1370 : Plaintiff : (Magistrate Judge Carlson) : v. : : ANDREW M. SAUL : Commissioner of Social Security1 : : Defendant : MEMORANDUM OPINION I. Introduction The Supreme Court has recently underscored for us the limited scope of our review when considering Social Security appeals, noting that: The phrase “substantial evidence” is a “term of art” used throughout administrative law to describe how courts are to review agency factfinding. T-Mobile South, LLC v. Roswell, 574 U.S. ––––, ––––,…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Biestek v. BerryhillSupreme Court of the United States · 2019
  3. Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  4. Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. Consolo v. Federal Maritime CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1966

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API