Legal Opinion
Thomas Michael Holt, Individually and on Behalf of His Class v. J. E. Moore, Superintendent, Avery County Unit
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided September 22, 1976No. 74-2318PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Per curiam
This is an appeal from an order of the district court in which it held, among other things, that the appellee, Thomas Michael Holt, had standing to represent a class consisting of:
“. . . all inmates of the North Carolina Department of Corrections, all prisoners in custody within the State of North Carolina, and those former inmates . subject to the control of the North Carolina Board of Paroles, against whom the United States government or any branch, division, or agency thereof, has filed or may file detainers, for any purpose, including untried federal criminal convictions and such…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Sosna v. IowaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Weinstein v. BradfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- DeFunis v. OdegaardSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
3Cited by13 opinions
- Charles L. Boals, Cross-Appellant v. Frank H. Gray, Superintendent, Ohio State Reformatory, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985
- Jane B. v. New York City Department of Social ServicesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1987
- Gary T. Bishop v. Committee on Professional Ethics and Conduct of the Iowa State Bar Association and Its Chairman, James E. Cooney, in His Official Capacity, Gary T. Bishop v. Committee on Professional Ethics and Conduct of the Iowa State Bar Association and Its Chairman, James E. Cooney, in His Official Capacity, (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1982
- Cutler v. PeralesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1989
- Zinser v. Continental Grain Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1981
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.