Legal Opinion
United States of America v. Prism Autism Foundation
District Court, S.D. California
Decided October 6, 2022No. 3:19-cv-00043Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 13 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and Case No.: 3:19-cv-00043-W-BLM the STATE OF CALIFORNIA, 14 ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR 15 Ex rel. DIANA MASON ATTORNEY’S FEES UNDER 31 U.S.C. 3730 [DOC. 22 & 24] 16 Plaintiffs, 17 v. 18 PRISM AUTISM FOUNDATION d/b/a PRISM BEHAVIORAL SOLUTIONS, 19 Defendants. 20 21 22 Pending before this Court is Relator Diana Mason’s Motion for Attorney’s Fees 23 under 31 U.S.C. § 3730. Defendant Prism Autism Foundation d/b/a Prism Behavioral 24 Solutions (“Prism”) opposes this motion. 25 The…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Camacho v. Bridgeport Financial, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Perdue v. Kenny A. ex rel. WinnSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Moreno v. City of SacramentoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.