Legal Opinion

Danson Exantus-Barr v. State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided April 6, 2016No. 4D14-2889PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGross, J.

Danson Exantus-Barr appeals his convictions of robbery with a firearm while wearing a mask and a weapons possession charge. He contends that he was unlawfully stopped and sought to suppress his own statements, the victim’s identification, and the seized property. The trial court denied his motion to suppress. We affirm, concluding that the totality of the circumstances, which included the location tracking of the victim’s stolen iPhone through the use of a “Find My iPhone” app, gave rise to a reasonable suspicion to stop appellant.

“The standard of review applicable to a motion to suppress…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Pagan v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2002
  2. Slydell v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001
  3. Backus v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003
  4. Jean v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2008
  5. Watts v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Sanchez v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016
  2. Herren v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2019
  3. Herren v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2019
  4. JEFTY JOSEPH v. STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API