Legal Opinion
Padiyar v. Albert Einstein College of Medicine of Yeshiva University
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided May 25, 2010PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Carol R. Edmead, J), entered April 22, 2009, which granted defendants’ motion *635for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
The instant plenary complaint, while couched in terms of unlawful discrimination and breach of contract, is in fact a challenge to a university’s academic and administrative decisions and thus is barred by the four-month statute of limitations for a CPLR article 78 proceeding, the appropriate vehicle for such a challenge (Maas v Cornell Univ., 94 NY2d 87, 92 [1999]; Risley v Rubin, 272 AD2d 198…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Maas v. Cornell UniversityNew York Court of Appeals · 1999
- Abramova v. Albert Einstein College of Medicine of Yeshiva UniversityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
3Cited by7 opinions
- Miyahara v. MajsakAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- Alrqiq v. New York UniversityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- Attallah v. New York Coll. of Osteopathic MedicineAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020
- Clogher v. New York Medical CollegeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Clogher v. New York Medical CollegeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.