Legal Opinion

Brookfield v. McClenahan

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 31, 1930No. File No. 7161PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAMPBELL, J-

Respondent above named instituted this action in circuit court apparently to rescind a certain transaction of purchase and sale, and recovered judgment against defendants, from which the defendants McClenahan and Lyman have appealed. No briefs have yet been file din this court by appellants. On December 18, 1930, appellant Lyman filed in this court his motion requesting this court to fix the terms and conditions of a supersedeas bond and authorize the filing thereof and stay further proceedings on the judgment below. So far as appellant Lyman is concerned, the judgment below,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Burger v. SinclairNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Mee v. HirningSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1922
  3. State ex rel. Haugan v. BelattiSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1917
  4. State v. CarlsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1916

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Haines v. WaiteSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Smith v. ReidSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API