Cristo Bros. v. M. Cristo, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Dissent
Kane, J. (dissenting).
We respectfully dissent. In the present case, defendant has moved to be relieved of its default which was caused by the undisputed fact that it did not receive the summons and complaint served pursuant to section 306 of the Business Corporation Law upon the Secretary of State. Under CPLR 317, a person served with a summons other than by personal delivery to him or his agent for service designated under CPLR 318 may be relieved of a default upon the finding of the court that he did not personally receive notice of the summons in time to defend and that he has a…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Cecelia v. Colonial Sand & Stone Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- Vogel v. Asgrow Mandeville Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
- Fletcher v. GreinerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
- Vogel v. Asgrow Mandeville Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1981